|
Amy,
I was wondering how you and other feminists feel
about women wanting to stay at home and raise
a family. As an example, feminists in years
past have "forced" a law to eliminate
the one family income tax credit which, in
the end, makes it very difficult to have a
child on one income. Granted, this was done
years ago, but obviously is still very much
supported. This makes life much harder for
those of us who want to stay at home to raise
our children. It is in my opinion, as well
as many other women and men, that the greatest
job any women could ever have is to raise her
children and not rely on other people such
as day care providers to raise them for us.
Don't get me wrong. Women should have choices,
but those choices should include ALL choices.
Not just the ones that the so-called "Feminists" support.
If you were a "feminist" then you
would certainly support a mother wanting to
stay at home as well as any women who wants
to go out and work.
Many women that I know, including myself, have
been raised by day care providers themselves,
while our mothers went out to work. I'm here
to tell you that it isn't worth it for the children.
Women have become so selfish and want to prove
their point so badly that in the end it is the
children who lose out.
I do not live an extravagant life nor do I wish
to. My husband and I have a small rancher, and
make a decent living (with both incomes). We
both went to college and have good jobs. But
if I had a child right now, (I'm 30 years old)
I would be unable to "make the choice" to
stay at home and raise him or her. What I want
to know is, how is it that "feminists" have
made life so much harder for women to "Make
the Choice" to stay at home. And why do
so many children have to be raised by someone
other than their own family? And please tell
me why that women like myself, are "looked
down upon" because of this choice. It seems
as if the feminist movement has gone too far
and is now, in some senses, moving in the wrong
direction.
Sincerely,
Kelly |
|
Kelly --
In general,
feminism is supportive of women and men who make
the choice to be full-time parents. What feminism
has fought for is that full-time mothering not
be the only option for women, as it was historically.
Also, feminism wants to ensure that it's a choice
equally open to men and women. The obstacle today
isn't feminism, but the economy -- who can afford
to live off one income? The other obstacle is
a state of mind, which is yours and tangible
-- and thus can only by rectified by one's own
thinking.
On the economy -- feminism has fought
to give child-rearing value and also to ensure
that poorer women who use government subsidies
to raise their children be allowed to do so and
not be vilified. Also, what has been revealed
is that it's not always in the child's best interest
to be at home with one full-time parent -- it
creates an inequality between the two parents
and it often smothers the child -- studies consistently
prove that what seems to be best for children
is to have their parents doing a combination
of work and family. The challenge is for each
woman to do what is appropriate for her unique
situation. I hope that between you and your husband
you can find a way to make that work.
Good luck,
- Amy
|