When
I first read your note I couldn't
help but think of Sally Mann
and her work, which, if you
aren't familiar with, is photographs
primarily of her children nude.
There has been a lot of controversy
(and compliments) surrounding
her work on the subject of when
does "nudity" go too far, especially
when children are involved.
I don't know of any good articles
off the top of my head, but
a search at the library should
bring up something.
Personally, I think that your
sister-in-law has it all wrong:
First of all--pornography is
based on exploitation; power
differences and hatred. Nudity
is about reality--the body in
its natural form--not being
put through a meat grinder or
tied up or violated by objects.
It's almost like we can't appreciate
the female body nude, because
the majority of the times that
we see it--it is being violated
and disrespected. I think that
if we put more time into valueing
and celebrating our bodies--we'd
have less time to spend hating
them.
As for specifics on the difference
between nudity and pornography
(of which there are many)---you
should check out: books/articles
by Anne Hollander, an art historian
and art critic; Making Pornography
Sexy by Diane Russell; and
an old cover story from
Ms.
Magazine -- "In Praise
of Women's Bodies" (late 1970's
early 1980s).
I hope that the above is helpful
and that your sister-in-law
will soon see the difference
between the cover of Playboy
and a Gustav Klimt painting--or
better yet, one by you!
Amy
|