|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under your 2004-05 discussion of reproductive
rights, you gave an incomplete answer to Sophie,
who asked if it's possible to be a pro-life Christian
feminist. It definitely is! I am one (although
not the born-again type she's describing, but
the social justice peace-loving-end-poverty-now
type.) Jesus was quite radical in his acceptance
of women, although many Christian churches have
fallen short in following his example. Although
you would surely disagree with the positions
of the organization Feminists for Life they
prove that one can be both pro-woman and pro-life. There
are many of us who believe that legalized abortion
offers a cop-out to really addressing the underlying
problems that lead many women to choose abortion.
Feminists for Life addresses this and shows that
the first wave of feminists stood strongly against
abortion.
|
|
|
|
I certainly think that one can be pro-life and
be a feminist, but from the research I have done
and the interactions I have had with feminists
for life — they aren't authentically feminist,
but rather use feminism to appear pro-woman.
When I have asked them to define feminism for
me or to put their work in a larger feminist
context, I haven't received a complete answer.
Part of being a feminist is ensuring that others
have access to the choices they need to make — regardless
of what choice they make. It's also about trusting
women to be agents in their own lives and not
about deferring a supposed right way. I certainly
applaud your opinion and think that there need
to be more people out there who are defining
pro-life/pro-choice for themselves and giving
their example to others without enforcing their
opinion onto others.
—
Amy
|
|
|
|
|
|