U.N. PACT SINKS ON ISSUE
OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
INTERNATIONAL
By Emily
Freeburg - WeNews correspondent
(WOMENSENEWS)
--Violence against women--and
what steps nations should
take to reduce it--became
the issue that led to a first-ever
diplomatic failure at the
United Nations Commission
on the Status of Women.
Meeting two
floors below the Security
Council in early March that
was also hamstrung over the
issues of conflict in Iraq,
the women's commission failed
to adopt official language
detailing measures to reduce
rape and trafficking, promote
reproductive health and end
impunity for war crimes against
women, as well as many other
ways to eliminate gender-based
violence.
The commission
had spent two weeks writing
what's called "Agreed
Conclusions" on two themes:
women's participation in and
access to the media and the
elimination of all forms of
violence against women. The
conclusions are typically
used as models for governments
to create policy and as advocacy
tools by non-governmental
organizations. The document
on ending violence against
women and girls would have
been used by advocates to
strengthen legislation to
end domestic violence and
sexual exploitation and trafficking
of women. It would also have
been used to educate governments
on how to promote and protect
women's human rights.
Consensus on
the conclusions came to an
end when Iran, Egypt, Pakistan,
Sudan and the U.S. raised
objections. The Iranian delegation
objected to a specific paragraph
that said governments must
not use religion or custom
as an excuse for violence
against women. But the failure
to pass this text was about
more than cultural differences.
The idea that
religion and custom are not
excuses for violence against
women is not new language
in U.N. documents. The subject
was already agreed upon in
various U.N. meetings, conferences
and documents, including the
Beijing Declaration and Platform
for Action from the Fourth
World Conference on Women,
the Special Session of the
General Assembly in June of
2000, and the Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms
of Violence against Women.
Many governments and non-government
organizations participating
in the commission agree that
to re-negotiate already agreed
upon text is to take steps
backward.
Also, some governments
emphasized that consensus
could have been reached if
all delegates had demonstrated
fairness and respect in their
negotiations.
"It's remarkable
to see that after decades
of work by feminist activists
and 12 years of U.N. conferences
to see the ways that women's
human rights are still seen
as negotiable," said
Charlotte Bunch, executive
director of Rutger's Center
for Women's Global Leadership.
Breakdown
of Security Council Talks
Influences Commission
Bunch also says
the impact of the fact that
the commission met during
the same time as the breakdown
of the Security Council over
Iraq cannot be underestimated.
The governments that were
responsible for ensuring consensus
was reached were preoccupied
and angry about their loss
of power at the Security Council.
"The Commission
on the Status of Women is
one of the weakest U.N. bodies
in terms of power and, when
it confronted problems, the
heads of governments were
upstairs" at Security
Council meetings, Bunch said.
The new people at commission,
she added, did not "have
the authority to come out
with new solutions and there
was no attention to working
out compromises."
Like many conflicts
at the United Nations, the
controversy over the religion
and custom clause played out
in disputes over procedure.
As the appointed
hour for adjournment neared,
Iran raised the objections.
Fernando Coimbra, chair of
the meeting and first secretary
of the Brazilian Mission,
moved to accept the conclusions
on violence regardless. The
delegations of Pakistan, Sudan,
Egypt and the U.S. raised
their placards in objection.
Ignoring them, Coimbra declared
the conclusions adopted. This
caused another round of placard
waving and gavel banging.
Eventually, the meeting was
adjourned because it was 7:30
p.m. on a Friday night and
the translators had left.
Some advocates
present speculate that, if
the government delegations
themselves had had more experience
and authority, they could
have asked the translators
to stay another two hours
and continued to reach consensus.
Regardless, when the commission
resumed 10 days later for
its closing meeting, governments
had time to renegotiate if
they so chose. Yet, the violence
statement still did not pass.
"The disappointment
is particularly sharp because
we were very close. Essentially
an agreement could not be
reached by the deadline. There
was little willingness by
delegations to continue negotiating
past that time," said
Carl Fox, social affairs advisor
to the U.S. mission.
Governments
did reach consensus on the
theme of women and media,
which asked governments to
increasingly involve women
in the information and communication
technology world and allocate
resources to ensure that women
and girls, especially in developing
countries, have access to
new information technologies.
The conclusions also require
that the recommendations from
the commission regarding women
and media be incorporated
in December's World Summit
on Information Society in
Geneva.
"The important
thing is that advocates at
the national level know that
the Commission on the Status
of Women exists," said
Muthoni Wanyeki, from Kenya's
African Women's Development
and Communication Network.
"It's one thing when
the women's groups are asking
their government to do this
and the other. It helps immensely
when you can say you as a
government committed to this
internationally. It embarrasses
them, and it often speeds
up the process of work on
policy, but it is a very tedious
process."
Many non-governmental
organizations, however, also
viewed the proceedings on
media with disappointment.
They say media discussions
did not touch upon hot issues
such as intellectual property
rights, media ownership, open
source technology or network
security. The policy on these
issues will likely be decided
in final negotiations at the
upcoming Geneva information
summit, a meeting that will
be dominated by business interests.
Emily Freeburg
is a freelance journalist
in New York.
For more
information:
U.N. Division
for the Advancement of Women--
- 47th Session: 3 - 14 March
2003: - http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/47sess.htm
PeaceWomen:
Women's International League
for Peace and Freedom-- -
Women and the United Nations:
- http://www.peacewomen.org/un/unindex.html
NGO Gender Strategies
Working Group: -
http://www.genderit.org/