Now, let's discuss what a feminist isn't.
T-shirt and button slogans such as a feminist
is "opposite of a doormat" and "not a masochist"
have outworn their usefulness in bringing
clarity to the subject. Feminism is more
often described by what it isn't than what
it is, which creates some confusion (and
is the reason why we defined it before going
into all this). The inadvertently humorous
descriptions by Right-wing ideologues such
as Pat Robertson don't help, either: "Feminists
encourage women to leave their husbands,
kill their children, practice witchcraft,
become lesbians, and destroy capitalism."
Of course, that definition is not so much
wrong as hyperbolic. To a fundamentalist,
that's just a description of no-fault divorce
laws, abortion rights, rejection of God
as a Father, acceptance of female sexuality,
and a commitment to workers.
Nonetheless, women far to the left of
Robertson still fear feminism. The fact
that the feminist movement has developed
networks to help women who are victimized
is one reason that women fear the word.
Identifying ourselves as feminists means
addressing uncomfortable topics: the humiliation
of being discriminated against, the fact
that we are vulnerable when we walk home
late at night or even in our homes, or the
sadness of discovering that the sons in
our families are treated altogether differently
from the daughters. Injustice and oppression
are hard to face, a fact that is evident
in the number of rape and sexual harassment
charges that emerge years, even decades,
after the event actually happened. To use
one example, Juanita Broaddrick waited twenty
years to accuse Bill Clinton of forcing
her into sex in a hotel room. This was during
a time when forced sex among acquaintances-what
is now called date rape-was excused as relatively
inevitable, certainly not criminal, male
behavior. Feminists fought for a realistic
legal definition of rape that acknowledged
degrees of sexual assault (and protected
male rape victims, too), a minimum one-year
statute of limitations, rape shield laws
that prohibit using a victim's sexual history
against her (or him), and the training of
emergency room and police personnel to gather
evidence, including a so-called "rape kit,"
when a victim comes into their hospitals
or precincts. Feminism would have meant
being there for Broaddrick-utilizing the
legal system and social service institutions-the
second she could get out of the hotel room
to press charges. To take it one step further,
the goal of feminism is to create a climate
in which Clinton couldn't possibly have
raped Broaddrick, or anyone, without knowing
that "no means no" and a prison sentence
was imminent. Even at the beginning of the
Second Wave, women were resistant to acknowledging
discrimination. The results of the 1972
Virginia Slims poll (the first one that
acknowledged women's issues) found that
men observed discrimination against women
more often than women did. As we said, consciousness
is everything. Even now, acknowledging inequality
begs one to do something about it-and that
is a daunting, albeit righteous, responsibility.
Feminism's philosophy certainly isn't
narrow-minded enough to be solely about
our sexuality or our pay-checks, and certainly
not about man-hating or chivalry. (In our
opinion, whoever gets to the door first
should be responsible for opening it). Still,
some people choose to stay away from feminism
because they don't want to be associated
with spooky stereotypes about feminists
and their freaky excesses. You know this
rap: some feminists think all sex is
rape, all men are evil, that you have to
be a lesbian to be a feminist, you can't
wear Girlie clothes or makeup, or that married
women are lame. This conversation is
usually baiting and can ride the force of
homophobia or internalized Phallofilia (socialized
glorification of the male principle and
men). Women who love lipstick and also standing
up for themselves, but are not politicized,
are especially vulnerable to being conned
into distancing themselves from the movement,
while fully hoping for and expecting to
be treated equally.
A good example of this is the Lilith Fair.
Canadian chanteuse Sarah McLachlan put together
an historic Mothership of ladies (another
term that deserves to be reclaimed; this
time from uptight, upper-class olden days
and proffered as just another, kind of jaunty,
word for women). These were stars who had
topped the music charts and McLachlan trotted
them across America to make the point that,
not only are female rock stars achieving
a critical mass, but women rake in the audiences.
The tour earned over $16.4 million in the
first year alone and drew over 75 percent
female audiences all three years of its
life. To make it even more stunning, the
Lilith management gave checks averaging
$30,000 to a battered women's shelter or
grassroots social service agency in every
locale in which the lavender Lilith backdrop
undulated. But what happened when McLachlan
was asked about women and politics? "The
tour isn't a soapbox for extremist feminism,"
she said in a New York Newsday interview
during the first tour. "This is not at all
about dissing men." There are certain assurances
we just shouldn't have to make, especially
when a majority of the back-up band members
are male, as is the vast majority of the
stage crew, sound people, bus drivers, talent
management, and the male-owned companies
that underwrote the tour. Besides, as a
friend of ours pointed out, even if there
weren't a male presence behind the front-women
at Lilith, there is no need for the disclaimer.
After all, an all-black tour of hip-hop
musician wouldn't feel obligated to assure
people that they are not dissing whites.
Furthermore, if Sarah McLachlan had brushed
up on her feminist history, she would have
been aware of Olivia Records, Redwood Recordings,
Ladyslipper distribution, and Michigan Womyn's
Music Festival. Then, she could have built
upon that separatist womyn's music movement
(which flourished in the seventies) as her
foundation, a movement that created a network
of producers, labels, and festivals entirely
outside of the mainstream. Shining a light
on the long line of women who continue to
transform the male-run music industry would
have gotten Lilith closer to its implied
goal of equal treatment for women. McLachlan
didn't remain fearful of the feminist implications
of her tour. According to Amy Ray of the
Indigo Girls, an artist who performed at
Lilith all three years, after a few years
of being immersed in this feminist experience,
McLachlan changed her tune and proudly called
the tour feminist. "I think Sarah always
had the same vision for Lilith," says Ray.
"But she became much more confident about
standing up for the idea that women need
an all-female tour, they want it, and they're
going to take it without apology."
Most of those Ladyslipper/Michigan/Olivia
feminists are womyn-loving-womyn, an association
which Lilith and many other women in rock
tend to fear. "The idea that all feminists
are lesbians is scary enough for some women
to stay away from the feminist label and
movement, even when their beliefs are basically
feminist," wrote Barbara Findlen in her
pioneering anthology Listen Up: Voices
from the Next Feminist Generation. Homophobia
is as essential to root out of the movement
as racism was and is. To eschew calling
yourself a feminist because you don't want
to be called a "dyke" is like not joining
the civil rights movement because you don't
want to be called a "nigger" or a "nigger
lover." Besides, regardless of one's sexuality,
all people have a vested interest in reclaiming
the inherent dignity of the terms lesbian,
gay, and queer, since straight women who
refuse a subservient role (and straight
men who refuse to dominate) are likely to
be called gay. Findlen also points out the
odd way that some straight women reconcile
themselves with this threat: by arguing
that feminists aren't all dykes.
(Which implies, among other ignorant assumptions,
that all gay women are inherently feminist.)
Rather than challenging the homophobia-and
misogyny-head on, this tactic sidesteps
the issue, allowing women to embrace a limited
feminism without disavowing dyke-baiting.
In truth, the movement is comprised of
women from all points on the sexual spectrum.
And, because they may be more able to risk
male disapproval, lesbian and bisexual women
have had a particularly creative and strong
history in the women's movement, from founding
the aforementioned womyn's music scene to
writing world-changing books such as Sexual
Politics (Kate Millett), Sister Outsider
(Audre Lorde), and Sisterhood is Powerful
(Robin Morgan) to being the most iconic
activists (Barbara Smith, Angela Davis,
and Rita Mae Brown). It's interesting to
note that homophobes never attack feminist
critic Camille Paglia for being of the Sapphic
persuasion-proof that dyke-baiting and bashing
feminists is only employed in the service
of woman-hating. As Kaia Wilson, formerly
the guitarist for lesbian super-group Team
Dresch and currently for the Butchies, puts
it: "There can be really good reasons for
not wanting to call yourself a feminist
but most of the time, it's due to misogyny."
Even when the winds of misogyny and homophobia
aren't blowing feminism's house down, women
can be their own big bad wolves. Injudicious
niceness, which is a socialized disease,
often explains why women tend not to demand
equality. It also may be why feminist women
feel it necessary to answer questions that
are hostile to feminism, no matter how silly
or offensive. Conversely, when a woman is
politically oriented and knowledgeable about
history, she knows the burden of proof should
be on the questioner and is less likely
to have a misguided sense of politeness.
When someone asks, "Why is it that all feminists
think they are better than men?" (or insert
any weird generalization involving lesbians,
matriarchies, and hatred of sex), one should
respond with something along the lines of
"Who are you referring to?" Imagine the
organizing and theorizing which has been
stopped because we have allowed ourselves
to be delayed by these distractions. In
the case of the mythical statement, "Andrea
Dworkin says that all sex is rape," recommend
actually reading her book Intercourse
(the salient chapter is called "Occupation/Collaboration"),
and starting the conversation from there.
To give you a taste, Dworkin writes pungently:
"Women lie about life by not demanding to
understand the meaning of entry, penetration,
occupation, having boundaries crossed over,
having lesser privacy: by avoiding the difficult,
perhaps impossible (but how will we ever
know?) questions of female freedom." Clearly
she is making a much more subtle, disturbing,
and ultimately liberating point than an
easy generalization could convey. If you
want more clarity, you could do what the
Hungry Mind Review did, and ask Dworkin
directly what she thinks sex is. "I think
of sexual contact and sexual intimacy as
pleasure," she told them. "And as a way
of experiencing freedom."
Feminism is often mistaken as being an
enabler, a "sop" discouraging women from
taking action in their lives, the genesis
of the victim culture that critics like
Katie Roiphe and Christina Hoff Sommers
so despise. Even women who rely on and are
seeking feminist resources can mistake feminism
for the equivalent of a Knight in Shining
Armor to save them from their woes. In fact,
the urge to protect women is part of the
problem feminists fight. As Susan Faludi
(famed author of Backlash and, more
recently, Stiffed) and others have
noted, protection starts out polite-women
and children first off the sinking ship
and so forth-and ends up justifying why
women can't be naval captains or firefighters
or subjects for medical research. Women
can't ride this antiquated stereotype and
at the same time fight for independence.
In reality, feminism requires action and
responsibility for oneself.
Take job discrimination as a case in point.
A clerk at Wal-Mart, sensing that she was
getting a raw deal, wrote to Ask
Amy. For the last five of her ten years
at the store, her salary had stayed the
same, while male cashiers were given annual
raises. Other feminists had done their part
by creating laws against sex discrimination,
trainings for implementation of these laws,
and organizations to help women through
the process. Amy's website informed her
of her legal rights but also pointed out
that now the Wal-Mart clerk must do her
part-document the discrimination and file
a complaint.
To sum up, feminism is helped by a working
knowledge of history, and requires a willingness
to act on behalf of yourself, and to stand
up for all women in the face of everything
from misogyny to a social mandate that says
"be nice."
The
above is an excerpt from Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future by Jennifer Baumgardner
and Amy Richards (Farrar, Straus & Giroux,
2000). Learn more at www.manifesta.net.
You can hear the authors themselves at www.talktotara.com.
Hear an Interview with Amy and Jennifer and Support Feminist.com!
Go to TalktoTara.com, download and listen to an inspiring and informative 20 minute audio interview with Amy Richards and Jennifer Baumgardner by Tara, on the subject of their latest book Grassroots - A Field Guide For Feminist Activism - a handbook for social justice. For each "Grassroots" interview you purchase, $1.00 will be donated to Feminist.com. A great way to make a difference, help support the cause and learn a little in the process : )
Read an excerpt from GRASSROOTS: A Field Guide for Feminist Activism by Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards